Comments on: Breaking Direct Selling News: XELR8 Launches New BAZI Ambassador Program

By: troydooly

troydooly — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:12:39 +0000

EXFUSE has been around a couple of years now. There have been some huge groups which joined the company, but soon found the compensation plan would not support the massive influx of their teams and they left.

I have not looked at it lately to see if they have fixed the compensation plan. Give me until next week to take a look. If you do not see anything, ping me back.

By: det2143

det2143 — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:11:16 +0000

Troy, Can you inform me of a new company called EXFUZE, it originated of of Florida. One of there top leader is Brett Hudson. I would appreciate it my brother God Bless and Siemper Fi,

By: troydooly

troydooly — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:36:01 +0000

Enrico,

Exactly what is your agenda in coming over to our community and instead of using your real name to make negative suggestions of our ethics and integrity?

Just curious, what's in it for you?

By: troydooly

troydooly — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:24:21 +0000

MillionaireIn5years,

There is absolutely NO biased! We are not actively building any company period, and do not get paid by any company. We do as we have disclosed received products, services and in some cases like wireless companies cell phones to test.

So, again get specific, show the community where the tainted bias comes in?

If you have been following my writings then you should know I left actively building in any company on Dec 31, 2009, so please give the community some basis of your unfounded suggestion.

By: millionairein5years

millionairein5years — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:18:43 +0000

Ok, you are mincing words, advocate or watchdog. Don't tell me you think there is a huge difference. Look it up. And it is good to see both sides of everything, I agree 100%. Having read your stuff for awhile, I am not implying that there is anything underhanded in your writings. What I am suggesting is that when writing "advocacy" pieces, there is at very least, the appearance of possible impropriety when one stands to gain (or lose) from the overall sentiment of the piece. Again, not claiming anything here, just making the case that a bias of any sort could taint the soundness of the assessment.